France reveals atomic bomb risk to Spain

Declassified documents from 1960 have shown that radiation from France's atomic bomb tests in the Algerian Sahara desert reached as far as the south coast of Spain.

France reveals atomic bomb risk to Spain
In the irradiated Algerian desert children are still born with deformities that campaigners blame on the experimental blasts by the French. Photo: AFP PHOTO/FAYEZ NURELDINE

French daily Le Parisien today published military papers that reveal the extent of the radiation risk from Fance's first atomic bomb, nicknamed 'Gerboise Bleue' (Blue Jerboa), which detonated on February 13th, 1960.

The affected zone wasn't restricted, as had been previously believed, to northern, eastern and central Africa but reached as far as the south of Europe.

A map, declassified last year but only published today, showed that by thirteen days after the explosion the radiation had spread to the south-east of Spain, Sicily and Sardinia.

Bruno Barillot, an atomic bomb expert, told Le Parisien that safety regulations in the 1960s "were much less strict than now."

The levels were described by the military as "generally very weak" and of no threat beyond the area of the blasts in the Algerian desert.

But Barillot countered, "That's what the army always say."

Radio-isotopes including iodine 131 and caesium 137 were released but it is impossible to know the exact levels, or by how much they were diluted in the atmosphere.

"No-one today doubts that these elements are causes of cancers and cardiovascular diseases," Barillot said.

"Medical advances have shown that even low doses of radiation can trigger serious diseases ten, twenty or thirty years later."

Although Barillot claimed that the documents had been selectively declassified to obscure the real truth, France's defence department said the process had been carried out by "an independent advisory commission" with no army involvement.

France carried out four atomic bomb tests in the Sahara desert between 1960 and 1961, before Algerian independence, and thirteen more afterwards until finally stopping in 1966.

A French law has recognized some illnesses suffered by French soldiers as being the result of exposure to radiation from the blasts.

But the subject remains a diplomatic thorn in the side of France's relations with Algeria, whose 150,000 citizens living in the blast zone are yet to receive compensation.

Don't miss stories about Spain, join us on Facebook and Twitter.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


Why cancer patients in Spain are changing address to stay alive

Almost half of all oncologists in Spain are reporting huge disparities between different regions in terms of patient access to the latest life-saving cancer treatments, spurring many patients to pack up and move (at least on paper).

Why cancer patients in Spain are changing address to stay alive
Photos: AFP

Time is of the essence when it comes to cancer and stopping it in its tracks.

But in Spain, a country where bureaucratic holdups are part and parcel of daily life, the repercussions attached to slow public service delivery in the health sector can prove lethal for some.

Spain’s Society of Oncology (SEOM) has just released a study that highlights the huge disparity in waiting times for newly approved cancer medications between the country’s different autonomous communities.

The timeframe from which a groundbreaking treatment is green lighted by Spain’s Ministry of Health to the moment it reaches a cancer patient in hospital varies between 5 to 17 months on average.

The wait is influenced by factors such as where the hospital is located in Spain, whether or not the regional health department has decided to incorporate the new medication into its cancer treatment and even the individual hospital’s modus operandi.


With a one and half-year wait obviously not an option for anyone with the disease, especially those which are particularly aggressive, patients are preferring to pack their bags and move to an address where the holdups are far less.

For this they need to be registered (empadronados) at a municipality that falls within the catchment area of the hospital that can get them the drugs faster.

Technically their names will have to be on a rental contract or title deeds in the desired location to be able to do so, although this can also be achieved in many regions if a person living at said address authorises that they be included in the ‘padrón’.

A total of 84 public hospitals from all of Spain’s 17 autonomous communities (as well as the autonomous city of Ceuta) took part in the study, with 11 new cancer medications and 5 cancer biomarkers (a substance or process that helps to diagnose cancer) used as the basis of the research.

A total of 43 percent of oncologists surveyed told SEOM they had patients who were having to wait excessively long to receive the most cutting-edge treatment and diagnosis methods theoretically available to them through the public system, with some practitioners citing three-year-long holdups for prescriptions that have already been approved by medical authorities.

In fact, the study initially encompassed 146 hospitals across Spain, but 42 percent of them failed to get back to SEOM with the relevant information.

The same confusion that envelops many bureaucratic processes in Spain has seeped into the country’s health system, the research reveals.

In this case, there’s no homogenous nationwide policy or body to call on or complain to. Sometimes it’s the hospital that decides, in other cases it’s the region’s health department, making it unclear for people who can’t afford the wait.

Perhaps for this reason SEOM hasn’t revealed where exactly cancer patients can get the latest treatment fast and easy, as it can vary enormously even within the same city or town.

Even though Spain’s public health system is highly regarded worldwide (9th best internationally in 2015, 19th in 2018 according to The Lancet), the evidence suggests these cancer treatment holdups are nothing new.

Cancer sufferers have been ‘fudging’ their address for years as the only solution available to them for the currently inefficient system, other than actually moving to another part of Spain to sidestep the bureaucratic wait.

Begoña Barragán, president of the Spanish Group of Cancer Patients (GEPAC) told online daily Público she had at one point had 17 patients registered at her home address in order for them to gain access to her local hospital, which offered far shorter waiting periods than on average in Spain.

Her organization encompasses 70 associations across the country which have helped other cancer patients do the same.

“I remember one local minister once warning me ‘I don’t want to find out that you’ve been doing this in our region’, to which I replied ‘don’t worry, you won’t find out,” Barragán told Público.

“None of this has anything to do with medical reasons, it’s all due to administrational and financial causes. Doctors themselves will always offer up the best treatment if it’s up to them.

“This is a post code lottery, a game of chance”.

With this strand of unequal health service delivery increasingly under scrutiny, Spain’s Ministry of Health has shifted responsibility to the country’s autonomous communities, saying it’s up to them to find a solution.

But cancer groups and Spain’s health patient ombudsman are calling instead for a system that is as systematic as paying taxes.

“The rights to health service access, to be cured, to save lives cannot be determined by the place where you live, says the president of Defensor del Paciente Carmen Flores.

“That’s serious discrimination.

“Therefore, Spain’s Ministry of Health must create some order among the autonomous communities, that’s why they’re given funds from the national budget after all”.